It’s interesting to me that my brother, Charlie Anderson, and I interact with the same generation, though in vastly different settings. I get the millennials between 18 – 22 years old in the classroom, and he picks up where I left off, training them at his consulting company, Boom Lab. I’ve wondered before just how accurate the pseudo-psychological characterizations of a whole generation could be, considering how many contexts there are for rearing the children of that generation. (Are the sweeping generalizations supposed to be of the sort of middle-of-the-road, middle class, median group? How “entitled” could the millennials raised in poorer environments really be?) And in my experience, even with a segment of the population likely to be middle or upper class, there’s a wide range of attitudes, abilities, and aptitudes.
Charlie has clearly given a lot of thought to how this generation of new workers interact in the workplace, how to harness their particular skills, and maybe rein in certain tendencies. Rather than a pseudopsychology of the millennials, he demonstrates how to evaluate people between 22-25 years old in the very real context of their jobs. It’s an interesting read, thought-provoking and careful to avoid stereotypes: http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/173282281.html